U.P. Number & Location Rules, 1968 — Complete Case Law Digest
| Order Date | Case No. | Case | Summary | Status | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/02/2008 | Special Leave Petition (civil) 7756 of 2006 | State of U.P. v. Manoj Kumar Dwived | “Close proximity” जैसी अस्पष्ट अभिव्यक्ति को निश्चित करने के लिए 100 metres/300 ft को उचित criterion माना गया। | disposed of | View |
| 02/02/2010 | WRIC(A)_39914_2009 | Bishop Johnson School And College Thru Principal And Another Vs. State | Rule 5(4) के तहत दूरी घटाने वाले संशोधन को Article 14 के आधार पर manifestly unreasonable/arbitrary मानकर strike down किया गया था, Distance objection वाले मामलों में object/purpose के लिए उपयोगी; पर judgment के विरुद्ध SC में interim stay का तथ्य बाद के HC decision में दर्ज है | Allowed | View |
| 22/03/2010 | SLP (C) No.- 007551 of 2010 | STATE OF U.P.& ORS. VERSUS BISHOP JOHNSON SCHOOL & COLLEGE & ORS. | From the judgement and order dated 02/02/2010 in CMWP No. 39914/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD | Case Status bishop johnson case as on 10-August-2026 | View |
| 22/12/2017 | WPIL(A)_41593_2011 | Akhil Bhartiya Sarva Jan Hitay Sarva Jan Sukhay Parishad | number and location | The present licences may be permitted to be operated only till 31st March, 2018 from the present location/site. | View |
| 02/05/2024 | WPIL(A)_335_2024 | Master Atharva Minor v. State of U.P | बाद में school अस्तित्व में आने वाले proviso की Court ने सीमित व्याख्या की; अगले excise year में licence/renewal के लिए Rule 5(4)(a) compliance आवश्यक माना। | partly allowed | View |
| 17/07/2025 | WPIL(A)_1803_2025 | Vineeta Sharma v. State of U.P | यदि shop licensed locality में है और Rules, 1968 का situs उल्लंघन सिद्ध नहीं है, तो केवल nuisance allegation पर removal का आदेश नहीं | dismissed | View |
| 30/10/2025 | WPIL(A)_813_2025 | Samir Kumar Banerji and 10 others Vs State of U.P. and 8 others | Residential colony / temple / amended distance, Rule 5(4) objection में protected place/colony का factual एवं legal character सिद्ध होना आवश्यक; Court ने 2008 amendment और earlier judgments की स्थिति examine की, “Residential colony” अथवा “place of worship” केवल assertion से नहीं माना जाएगा;documentary/site evidence आवश्यक | dimissed | View |
| 19/05/2025 | WPIL(L)_485_2025 | Mahesh Soni And 7 Others Vs. State Of U.P. | 2025-26 की composite liquor shop की location को challenge करने वाली PIL; current Rule 5 framework के लिए relevant है। | dismissed WPIL(L)_485_2025 Hindi | View |
| 30/11/1970 | यह Rules, 1968 के शुरुआती महत्वपूर्ण judgments में है। Court ने Rule 2 तथा Rule 5 की scheme examine की। Rule 5(1) के अनुसार shops की location और site Collector द्वारा निर्धारित की जानी है। Settlement के दौरान site change सामान्य नियम नहीं है; cogent reasons आवश्यक हैं। | Sushil Chandra v. State of U.P., 30.11.1970 (Allahabad HC) | Licensee स्वयं यह दावा नहीं कर सकता कि उसे अपनी पसंद के स्थान पर shop चलाने का absolute right है, स्थान परिवर्तन के आवेदन पर Collector को statutory suitability, public interest और Rules के restrictions independently examine करने चाहिए। | dismissed | View |
| 16/12/2005 | C.M.W.P. No. 86 of 2004, decided 16.12.2005 | Pankaj Garg v. State of U.P., 16.12.2005 (Allahabad HC) | दुकान की location/shifting, विरोध के कारण दुकान बंद होने और licence-fee remission से जुड़ा महत्वपूर्ण मामला। | dismissed | View |
| 12/11/2010 | Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1043 of 2010 (Allahabad HC) | Rakesh Singh v. State of U.P., 12.11.2010 | Court ने माना कि Rule 2-A/Rule 5 के अधीन Collector cogent reasons दर्ज करके liquor shop को relocate कर सकता है। | One of us (Justice Yatindra Singh) has dismissed the writ petition; whereas, the other (Justice Rajes Kumar) has allowed the writ petition. | View |
| 29/05/2013 | Writ Petition No. 657 (MB) of 2002 (LUCKNOW BENCH) | Anoop Kumar Jaiswal And Another vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Nagar Vikas | Nagar Nigam objection / Rule 5(8), Urban area में local body को notice औपचारिकता मात्र नहीं; objection को Collector द्वारा consider करना आवश्यक, Nagar Nigam objection पर reasoned consideration आवश्यक | dismissed | View |
| 04/09/2003 | C.M.W.P No. 822 of 2003 | Krishna Kumar v. State Of U.P And Others | Number/location/new shop,Shops की संख्या और location तय करने का statutory क्षेत्र Collector/Excise authorities का, किसी व्यक्ति को किसी particular shop/location के लिए vested right नहीं | dismissed | View |
| 02/04/2014 | Civil Misc. Review Application No. 120475 of 2014 IN WRIT - C No. - 16750 of 2014 | Cantonment Board Meerut v. State of U.P. | Cantonment area, Rule 2-A के अंतर्गत cantonment में shop location के लिए competent military authority की prior consent का प्रश्न महत्वपूर्ण, Cantonment cases में सामान्य Collector approval पर्याप्त मानकर नहीं चलना चाहिए | disposed | View |
| WPIL/1178/2026 | RAM KISHUN KESARWANI VS STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS | number and location | View | ||
| 08/12/2010 | WPIL(A)_70304_2010 | Ram Kishun Kesarwani Vs State of U.P. and others | country liquor shop in the residential area | disposed of with direction | View |
| Listing Date (08-04-2026) | WRIC(L)_10759_2025 | Dinesh Yadav And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Excise Lko. And 5 Others | It has been submitted by learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner that license of a liquor shop has been issued by the State respondents in favour of respondent no. 6, which is the immediate vicinity of Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Institute of Medical Sciences, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow | View | |
| 23/04/2026 | WTAX(A)_1574_2025 | A.H. Wheeler & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others | number and location | Let the matter be posted again on 11th May, 2026 | View |
| 02/09/2025 | WPIL(A)_2190_2025 | Indra Mohan Shukla Vs State of UP | number and location | dismissed with observation Serious allegations have been made against the counsel for the petitioner | View |
| 24/03/2025 | WPIL(A)_610_2025 | Ravikant Kesarwani And 6 Others Vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others | number and location | disposed of | View |
| THE BOMBAY FOREIGN LIQUOR RULES, 1953 | View | ||||
| THE TAMIL NADU LIQUOR RETAIL VENDING (IN SHOPS AND BARS) RULES, 2003 | View |