{"id":6917,"date":"2024-05-04T10:31:50","date_gmt":"2024-05-04T05:01:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/?page_id=6917"},"modified":"2026-09-26T19:23:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-26T13:53:08","slug":"allahabad-hc-judgments-on-service-matters","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/?page_id=6917","title":{"rendered":"Important Judgments and Orders on Service Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad HC Judgments on Service Matters<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
\tWrit<\/th>Party Name<\/th>Department<\/th>Tags<\/th>Summary <\/th>Order Date<\/th>Download<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
WRIA(L)_9296_2026<\/td>Gireesh Chandra Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Excise, Bapu Bhawan, Lko. And Another<\/td>Excise<\/td>Dismissal<\/td>Dismissal of an Excise Inspector from Service on the Grounds of Conviction in a Criminal Case<\/td>14\/10\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_9225_2026<\/td>State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Excise Section- I Lko And 2 Others Vs Deepak Rastogi<\/td>Excise <\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Claim Petition No.1133 of 2013 (Deepak Rastogi vs. State of U.P. and another)<\/a><\/td>22\/09\/2026
\ndismissed <\/td>		View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_8509_2026<\/td>State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Excise Lko. And Another Vs Dheeraj Sharma<\/td>Excise<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>fresh inquiry from the stage of reply to the charge-sheet<\/td>03\/09\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_2932_2026<\/td>Sanjay Kumar Pathak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. State Tax Deptt. Lko. and 5 others<\/td>Commercial Tax<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Disciplinary punishment based on unrecorded oral instructions and vague allegations cannot stand; hence the charge-sheet, inquiry report and punishment order were quashed, Chief Secretary, Govt. of U.P., is directed to ensure that in future necessary instructions be issued in writing in place of oral instructions and in case, it is unavoidable, it should be recorded at the earliest<\/td>01\/09\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_4163_2025<\/td>Shyam Deo Prasad Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Excise 4 Th Floor Bapu Bhawan And Another<\/td>Excise<\/td>Withholding of Provisional Pension and 17-Year-Long Departmental Enquiry<\/td>Withholding of Provisional Pension of an Excise Inspector and Pendency of Departmental Enquiry for 17 Years<\/td>17\/04\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_15202_2025<\/td>Mohar Singh Kushwaha Vs State Of U.P.<\/td>Food Safety And
\nDrugs<\/td>		departmental enquiry<\/td>once the suspension order had been stayed in its entirety, the employee was required to be restored to the same position and place of posting which he occupied before suspension<\/td>19\/12\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_13092_2025<\/td>Mohar Singh Kushwaha Vs State Of U.P.<\/td>Food Safety And
\r\nDrugs<\/td>		departmental enquiry<\/td>Until further orders of this Court, operation of impugned suspension
\norder dated 16.10.2025 shall remain stayed. This order however shall not
\npreclude continuance of any enquiry against petitioner<\/td>		19\/11\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_12939_2026<\/td>Smt. Sunita Ojha Vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another<\/td>Excise<\/td>online transfer, departmental enquiry<\/td>Till the next date of listing, the order of suspension dated 06.08.2026 passed by
\nrespondent No.2, shall remain stayed.
\n8. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not stayed the departmental
\nproceedings against the petitioner, which may go on and be brought to a logical end
\nby the respondents in accordance with law<\/td>		21\/08\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_15186_2026<\/td>Bijai Chand Jaiswal Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others<\/td>Excise<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_12911_2026<\/td>Bijai Chand Jaiswal Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others<\/td>Excise<\/td>online transfer, departmental enquiry<\/td>Till then, operation of the order of suspension dated 6.8.2026 passed by
\nrespondent no.2 shall remain stayed. However, it is made clear that this
\nCourt has not stayed the disciplinary proceedings pending against the
\npetitioner and they may go on and be brought to its logical consequences<\/td>		20\/08\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_12559_2026<\/td>Smt. Savita Rani Vs State Of U.P. <\/td>Excise<\/td>online transfer, departmental enquiry<\/td>order of suspension dated 23.06.2026
\npassed by respondent no. 2, shall remain stayed<\/td>		18\/08\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_1028_2013<\/td>Surendra Kumar Dewedi Vs State Of U.P.<\/td><\/td>selection<\/td>Junior Assistant<\/td>Interlocutory Non AFR<\/a><\/td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_8432_2026<\/td>Keshava Ram Sonkar Vs State Of U.P.<\/td><\/td>medical claim <\/td>payment of Rs. 4,70,000\/- has been made to the petitioner on
\n06.07.2026<\/td>		28\/07\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SPLA(A)_801_2026<\/td>State Of Up And 4 Others Vs Om Prakash Singh<\/td><\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>stay and next listing date 06.08.2026<\/td>20\/07\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_6574_2026<\/td>Mamta Pandey v. State of U.P.<\/td><\/td>maternity leave<\/td>The impugned order dated 16.06.2026 was quashed, and the respondents were directed to sanction the petitioner\u2019s maternity leave<\/td>15\/07\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_6495_2026<\/td>Nirankar Nath Pandey v. State of U.P.<\/td><\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>disposed of with a direction<\/td>29\/07\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_5368_2026<\/td>Alok Kumar Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin, Secy. Excise Lko. And Another<\/td><\/td>adverse entry 08-05-2026<\/a><\/td>stay<\/td>26\/05\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_4733_2026<\/td>Rajendra Prasad Verma Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Excise, Lko. And
\nAnother<\/td>		<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>disposed of with a direction<\/td>11\/05\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_4545_2026<\/td>Dharmendra Narayan Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Excise, Lko. And Another<\/td><\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>personal affidavit <\/td>08\/05\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_11446_2024<\/td>Om Prakash Singh Vs State Of Up And 4 Others<\/td><\/td>deduct 20% pension of the petitioner for 3 years<\/td>Recovery from pension cannot be ordered merely on allegation of misconduct; there must be a clear finding of financial loss to the State<\/td>04\/05\/2026 (allowed)<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_6225_2026<\/td>Kaushal Kumar Vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others<\/td><\/td><\/td>List in the week commencing 20.07.2026 before appropriate Bench<\/td>29\/04\/2026<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_5982_2026<\/td>Phool Kumari Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others<\/td><\/td>This order is useful for the principle that if a petitioner relies upon a document which appears to be fabricated or manufactured, the Court may refuse to entertain the writ petition and may even consider imposing exemplary costs. Withdrawal of such a petition may also be refused with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action<\/td> In this view of the matter, the Court is of the opinion that the writ
\npetition should be dismissed imposing exemplary costs of Rs.50,000\/-<\/td>		27\/\/04\/2026 <\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_32943_2016<\/td>Ram Ashre Prajapati Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.<\/td><\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>This judgment is useful for the principle that where any act has been done in the absence of an employee and without his mandatory prior approval, the employee cannot be held guilty for subsequently refusing to verify or authenticate such irregular act.<\/td>24\/04\/2026 (allowed)<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_5995_2025<\/td>State Vs Prem Singh<\/td><\/td>order dated 26.09.2024 passed in Claim Petition No. 2364 of 2022<\/td>dismissed<\/td>27\/05\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_11356_2025<\/td>Hari Narain Yadav<\/td><\/td>suspension<\/td>order dated 18th July, 2025 stayed<\/td>08\/08\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_8339_2025<\/td>Chandra Shekhar Singh EI<\/td><\/td>suspension <\/td>suspension dated 31.05.2025
\nstayed<\/td>		11\/06\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_5757_2025<\/td>State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary (Excise) Deptt. Lucknow And Another vs Pingaksha Tripathi<\/td><\/td>order passed
\nby the U.P. Public Services Tribunal<\/td>		<\/td>23\/05\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_432_2025<\/td>Ram Swarth Chaudhary AEC<\/td><\/td>open vigilance inquiry<\/td>Stay<\/td>28\/04\/2025<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_10529_2024<\/td>Vandana Singh EI <\/td><\/td>dept inquiry<\/td><\/td>14\/11\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_10549_2024<\/td>State Of U.P.
\nDigvijay Narayan Singh (AEC)<\/td>		<\/td>Writ against order passed by Service Tribunal in Claim Petition 1019\/2023<\/td><\/td>14\/11\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_16630_2024<\/td>Anil Kumar (EI)
\nState Of U.P. <\/td>		<\/td>suspension, overrating<\/td><\/td>13\/11\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_15359_2024<\/td>Ramvir Singh And 11 Others
\nState of UP And 15 Others<\/td>		<\/td>Excise Inspector seniority list dated 01.08.204<\/td><\/td>27\/09\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_3196_2024<\/td>State Of U.P.
\nAvdhesh Ram<\/td>		<\/td>judgment
\nand order dated 08.08.2023 passed in Claim Petition No. 392 of 2023,
\nAvdhesh Ram Vs. State of U.P. & Others.<\/td>		<\/td>10\/09\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_11277_2024<\/td>Ashutosh Upadhyay (EI) State Of U.P. <\/td><\/td>suspension<\/td><\/td>02\/09\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_7234_2024<\/td>State Of U.P.
\nManoj Kumar Singh (EI)<\/td>		<\/td>liquor death in Hathras, disciplinary authority shall also consider whether the
\nEnquiry Officer who has not followed the Rules is liable for action under the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Kaptan Singh <\/td>		<\/td>02\/09\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CRLP(A)_18777_2023 <\/td>Nirankar Nath Pandey Vs State of UP<\/td><\/td>vigilance inquiry<\/td><\/td>11\/01\/2024<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_18121_2022<\/td>Aslam Ali Siddiqui<\/td><\/td>suspension order should not ordinarily exceed three months<\/td><\/td>23\/01\/2023<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_16769_2023<\/td>Ashutosh Dubey (EI) <\/td><\/td>criminal case & departmental proceeding<\/td><\/td>13\/12\/2023<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_7161_2023<\/td>Kamla Pati Chaudhary<\/td><\/td>dept inquiry<\/td><\/td>03\/11\/2023<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_847_2023<\/td>Yatendra Kumar Sharma (EI)<\/td><\/td>low strength<\/td><\/td>02\/03\/2023<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(L)_3989_2023<\/td>Kamleshwar Kashyap (Res.) <\/td><\/td>overrating not misconduct<\/td><\/td>25\/05\/2023<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_19281_2018<\/td>Avanish Kumar Pandey
\nVs State Of U.P. And 4 Others<\/td>		<\/td>transfer, liquor death<\/td>allowed
\nThe State of Uttar Pradesh v. Avanish Kumar Pandey \u2014 Diary No. 6166\/2019; SLP(C) Nos. 7259\u20137267\/2019; Civil Appeal Nos. 7054\u20137062\/2019<\/a><\/td>		02\/11\/2018 <\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WRIA(A)_12708_2018<\/td>Dhruv Bhushan Dubey (Res.) (Police)<\/td><\/td>liquor death<\/td><\/td>25\/5\/2018<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERB(L)_1191_2010<\/td>Bankey Lal Gupta (Res.) <\/td><\/td>Rule 10 of the UP Government Servant (Disciplinary and Appeals) Rules, 1999<\/td><\/td>23\/08\/2010<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":133,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_regular_price":[],"currency_symbol":[],"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6917","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"post_slider_layout_featured_media_urls":{"thumbnail":"","post_slider_layout_landscape_large":"","post_slider_layout_portrait_large":"","post_slider_layout_square_large":"","post_slider_layout_landscape":"","post_slider_layout_portrait":"","post_slider_layout_square":"","full":""},"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-11-02 00:21:52","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6917"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6917\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16500,"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6917\/revisions\/16500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abkaritoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}